The working solution
A complete route from today's system to the requested result. Understand how the whole thing can work.
A METHOD FOR AI-LED DEVELOPMENTv…
You describe what should work. LHC gives coding agents the method to research, design, split the work, test it in practice and integrate the result.
Not another code generator. A method for taking responsibility for the whole result.
“I want a result I can actually use.”
→ main / your branch01 / THE COMPLETE JOURNEY
The process starts before the first line of code and ends after the result is tried and brought into shared development history.
Loading the current method from Git…
Loading the current method from Git…
A failed user scenario returns to repair, not to a report marked “done”.
02 / FIRST, DESIGN THE RIGHT THING
Research the code. Compare viable solutions and challenge the assumptions. Then make three passes over one plan, not three implementations.
A complete route from today's system to the requested result. Understand how the whole thing can work.
Improve the plan. Compare alternatives. Let independent criticism expose weak assumptions and unnecessary compromises.
Cut what does not serve this result. Keep the highest-value changes and deliver the entire accepted outcome.
THIS IS THE VERSION WE BUILDof the ideal's useful value is a design target, not permission to deliver 80% of the promised result.
03 / SMALL TASKS. A SHARED RESULT.
Lead holds the whole objective. Workers own small, verifiable contributions. Independent tasks run together; real dependencies set the order.
W₁W₂W₃∑◎Delivery time follows the critical path and available capacity, not the sum of every task.
The planned size of a leaf, including its check. Not a timer that kills an agent after 15 minutes.
Lead coordinates decisions, dependencies and convergence. Parallel execution never means “someone else will finish it”.
FOLLOW ANY PLAN FROM YOUR PHONE
When a plan is created, the agent gives you its permanent public link once.
Now: connect the mode switch in four adapters
Ends ≈ today 14:45 (in 20 min)No changes for 7 h · stopped at: first audible reply
04 / THE TEST IS SOMEONE USING IT
Deploy to the available development environment. Give fresh testers a realistic goal, not your implementation story or a recipe for success.
Technical review checks the change and its real regression risk.
No code. No diffs. A deployed product and a real task. Different personas cover the affected user journeys.
Return observed failures to implementation. Do not turn every preference into a new product requirement.
05 / FINISHED MEANS MERGED
A folder full of finished worktrees is not delivery. Publish, review and converge the owned changes into the project's development branch.
feature/interfacefeature/logicfeature/regressionDev integration does not authorize an automatic merge into an external owner's main branch.
The target is configured per project. For shared Airlock work: megamen32-dev. Ownership and actual permissions still apply.
06 / WHO OWNS WHAT
Lead orchestrates; Workers execute. Independent roles challenge decisions and test the result. Each has a responsibility, not a ceremonial place in a queue.
Loading the current method from Git…
THE METHOD IS NOT THE ENTIRE PLATFORM
The backlog chooses the work. Agent Herder manages sessions and harnesses. LHC defines how engineering work reaches a verified result.
This page explains the intended method. It does not claim that every mechanism is already automated. The repository records the remaining implementation gaps.
Read the current limitations ↗FROM AN IDEA TO SOMETHING YOU CAN TRY